Pros and Cons of Competitive Bidding

By admin : Comments 1
January 30th, 2012
Overview
Competitive bidding in Pay-Per-Click is essentially using a competitor’s brand terms in your keyword list to drive traffic to your site. Since 2008, bidding on trademarked terms is an eligible practice, but using competitor brand terms in the ad-copy is still prohibited and your ads will be disapproved.
Why should you not bid on competitors brand names?
Bidding War: Bidding on your competitor’s brand terms will inevitably lead to competitors also bidding on your brand terms, as a result the Cost-Per-Click of your brand terms will increase. This practice continues until one company cannot afford to raise their CPC any further.

Cost Implications: For the majority of businesses it is their branded terms which drives significant portion of the traffic. Therefore should you initiate a Bidding War and thus inflate you brand CPCs there may be a disproportional increase in the cost of your PPC marketing.  In most cases the increase in traffic for competitive keywords does not justify the increase in brand costs.

Budgetary Disadvantage: In some cases, your competitor may have larger PPC budget which could result in them dominating search engine result for your primary brand keywords.
Offer Is Not as Good: Make sure before bidding on competitors that your product is either similar or significantly better. This could be a lower service charge or specific technological advantages but it is important to not position yourself against a competitor who may have a considerably better product.
When could you bid on competitors brand names? 
Offer Is Better or Similar: In instances where your product offering is better or similar to that of your competitor an aggressive strategy to capture some of their market share may be a good idea.
Vertical Specific:  In instances where there is already a lot of brand bidding it may be viable to implement a more discreet long-tail strategy which is not obviously targeting competitor key brand terms.
Brand Protection: When a competitor bids on your brand terms, a proactive approach should be taken. First step is to contact the competitor and request an immediate end to the activity. If there is no response from the competitors you could launch a competitor keyword campaign. It is important to pay close attention to the performance of these competitor keywords to make sure they are an effective means of acquiring qualified traffic.
What should we do when competitors bid on our brand name keywords? 
Step 1 – Persuasion: Speak to the competitor and explain that it would be in both your interests to cease competitive bidding, unless you are confident that you have the budget to support this and your product offering is significantly better or similar.
Step 2 – Counter Bid: If they do not stop bidding on your brand you could bid on the competitor’s brand name. These terms are usually expensive due to low Quality Score thus performance tracking is vital.
Our Thoughts
Ultimately each brand should evaluate the effectiveness of competitive bidding on an case by case basis. In an ideal world, competitive bidding would be avoided altogether; from an ethical standpoint it can be detrimental to a well-established brand, seen as an underhanded tactic to steal customers. However if your services or products closely matches that of your competitor’s, it is likely that anyone searching on those brand terms will also have an interest in your products.

Competitive bidding in Pay-Per-Click is essentially using a competitor’s brand terms in your keyword list to drive traffic to your site. Since 2008, bidding on trademarked terms is an eligible practice, but using competitor brand terms in the ad-copy is still prohibited and your ads will be disapproved unless they receive permission from the owner of the TM to use the brand term on their creatives.

This article aims to list some of the pros and cons of competitive bidding.

Reasons why you should not bid on competitor’s terms

a) Bidding War
Bidding on your competitor’s brand terms will inevitably lead to competitors also bidding on your brand terms, as a result the Cost-Per-Click of your brand terms will increase. This practice continues until one company cannot afford to raise their CPC any further.

Cost Implications: For the majority of businesses it is their branded terms which drives significant portion of the traffic. Therefore should you initiate a Bidding War and thus inflate you brand CPCs there may be a disproportional increase in the cost of your PPC marketing.  In most cases the increase in traffic for competitive keywords does not justify the increase in brand costs.

Budgetary Disadvantage: In some cases, your competitor may have larger PPC budget which could result in them dominating search engine result for your primary brand keywords.

b) Offer Is Not as Good
Make sure before bidding on competitors that your product is either similar or significantly better. This could be a lower service charge or specific technological advantages but it is important to not position yourself against a competitor who may have a considerably better product.

When, as a business, you could benefit from bidding on competitor’s terms

a) 
Offer Is Better or Similar
In instances where your product offering is better or similar to that of your competitor an aggressive strategy to capture some of their market share may be a good idea.

b) Vertical Specific
In instances where there is already a lot of brand bidding it may be viable to implement a more discreet long-tail strategy which is not obviously targeting competitor key brand terms.

c) Brand Protection
When a competitor bids on your brand terms, a proactive approach should be taken. First step is to contact the competitor and request an immediate end to the activity. If there is no response from the competitors you could launch a competitor keyword campaign. It is important to pay close attention to the performance of these competitor keywords to make sure they are an effective means of acquiring qualified traffic.

Competitors are bidding on your brand terms. What should you do?

1) Persuasion: Speak to the competitor and explain that it would be in both your interests to cease competitive bidding, unless you are confident that you have the budget to support this and your product offering is significantly better or similar.

2) Counter Bid: If they do not stop bidding on your brand you could bid on the competitor’s brand name. These terms are usually expensive due to low Quality Score thus performance tracking is vital.

Should brands bid on competitors’ terms?

There is no Yes or No answer to this question. Brands should evaluate the effectiveness of competitive bidding on a case by case basis.  Both business and brand objectives should be taken into account. From a commercial point of view, competitive bidding could represent an extra source of revenue especially when running promotions or sales. These would allow Brand X to appear in the search results when users search for Brand Y and persuade them to consider their offer instead of the competition’s. From an ethical perspective this could be detrimental to a well-established brand, seen as an unfair tactic to steal customers from the competition.

Google Launches Adwords for Video Ads

By SergioB : Comments 1
September 29th, 2011

Google has launched an equivalent of AdWords for YouTube’s online video formats TrueView. Advertisers can now create and manage video campaigns across YouTube and the Google Display Network using the same AdWords interface that is used for search, display and mobile ads.

To read more, click here

Paid Search Drives Incremental Traffic

By SergioB : Comments 1
September 8th, 2011

A meta-study of 400+ Search Ads Pause studies, shows what happens when advertisers pause their search ad campaigns. This video explains the methodology and walks through results that show paid serach traffic is incremental to organic search traffic.

Google has put together an exhaustive document to support the theory, which I think is a great argument to bring forward when clients ask whether it is worth bidding on branded terms.

To read the full study, click here

Is Google Related Going to Impact Internet Users Behaviour?

By SergioB : Comments 1
August 22nd, 2011

Google has recently launched Google Related, an extension of Chrome that generates content relevant to what is being displayed on the page.

Whenever you’re navigating to a new page, Google Related will look for interesting related content and, if available, display it in a bar at the bottom of your page. Google Related can display categories such as videos, news articles, maps, reviews, images, web sites and more. To preview a listed item or see additional items, just use your mouse to hover over different categories in the bar. For instance, if you are reading a web page about a singer, Google related will show you other pages related to that artist, i.e. his next concert etc.

Although this might represent a great tool for online users, this could be a threat for e-commerce sites, as the tool will display alternative web pages where users can purchase the same product possibly at a more competitive price. So, the real threat lies in the fact that website owners might potentially lose customers’ interest since the alternative is given to them right there at the bottom of the page.

In order for websites to be considered by Google Related, need to have a very well optimised content making it even more important for companies to invest in Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) activities. The more relevant and up-to-date is the content the higher are the chances to be selected and proposed by Google Related to the relevant target audience.

Upon successful roll out of the new tool, it will be interesting to see how Google will manage the competition of the companies optimising the content for Google Related activities. A possible way would be to monetise the service…but who knows…Let’s see!

For more information on Google Related: Click Here

Search Dominates Traffic to Retail Destination Sites. Social is on the Rise in UK

By SergioB : Comments 1
August 10th, 2011

Enders Analysis recently released their first ‘UK consumer e-commerce trends’ report and included this infographic based on comScore data highlighting online retail behaviour. Online search engines like Google and Bing accounted for 36% of traffic to Apple, Amazon and Tesco while Social Networking sites like Facebook accounted for 8% of traffic in May 2011.

AdWords Appear At Bottom Of SERPs In New Google test

By SergioB : Comments 1
August 2nd, 2011

Google is apparently testing a new AdWords placement at the bottom of search results pages. The successful implementation of this features will allow lower positioned ads to get higher positions on the SERP moving from page two to page one. Despite the immense benefits that it could bring in terms of CTR and organic SEO, this could affect Google’s revenue for two reasons:

1) Advertisers paying premium prices per click to be on the first page will have to face an increasing competition and therefore might not like it

2) People might feel encouraged to click on the lower positioned ads once they scroll down to see what else is on the market resulting in Google earning less per click. On the other hand, this could represent an opportunity to increase the overall traffic through paid ads.

To read more, click on: Read

Google Search Testing New “Clean” Design: For Tablets Only?

By SergioB : Comments 1
July 28th, 2011

Google is testing yet another design, this one is the same gray and black bar look but places the search filters and navigation at the top of the page, instead of on the left.

Amit Agarwal posted screen shots of the new design, here are two of the many screen shots he has posted:

To read more, click on: Read

Paid Search & Social Media: Can They Be Friends?

By SergioB : Comments 1
July 27th, 2011

As a large-scale paid search marketer, you may believe social media marketing has little to do with your craft. After all, most marketers hold true to the notion that paid search is extremely measurable, focused on bottom-line ROI and grounded in analytics, whereas social media, including Facebook, Twitter, blogs, and viral video, is experimental, difficult to measure, and all about engagement and branding.

To read more, click on: Read

The Most Expensive Keywords in Google AdWords

By SergioB : Comments 1
July 27th, 2011
After Google’s release of Q2 2011 earnings, Wordstream.com took it upon themselves to discover the top 20 most expensive keywords, which bring in Google it’s advertising revenue. Paving the way is “Insurance” with an average cost per click of $54.91 followed by “Loans” at $44.28. To discover the full word list, follow this link to the Wordstream page.
To read more, click here

After Google’s release of Q2 2011 earnings, Wordstream.com took it upon themselves to discover the top 20 most expensive keywords, which bring in Google it’s advertising revenue. Paving the way is “Insurance” with an average cost per click of $54.91 followed by “Loans” at $44.28. To discover the full word list, follow this link to the Wordstream page.

To read more, click here

Introduction to the Google Ad Auction

By SergioB : Comments 1
July 24th, 2011

Hal Varian – Chief Economist at Google – provides an introduction to the Google Ad Auction.

Main Points:

a) The Quality Score (QS) depends on three important factors: CTR (the highest contributor), Relevancy and Quality of the Landing Page.

b) The Ad Rank is calculated by multiplying the QS by the Bid Price.

c) The CPC is given by dividing the Ad Rank of the advertiser below you divided by your quality score.